Why is the Automotive Software Industry at a Critical Crossroad?

Maddison Baldwin, Director of Information Technology, Volvo Cars

Why is the Automotive Software Industry at a Critical Crossroad?Maddison Baldwin, Director of Information Technology, Volvo Cars

Research shows a significant gap between strong software organizations and less capable groups, with top businesses reporting throughput and quality three to six times greater than bottom performers.

The automotive industry is being rapidly reprogrammed by software. Autonomous vehicles, Connectivity, Electrification, and Shared mobility (ACES), the four most significant disruptions in recent years, rely heavily on cutting-edge software. More upheaval in these areas is on the way. 

OEMs, suppliers, and new entrants from across the industry are hoping to seize critical control points in this new, software-driven value chain.

Even as the landscape alters, automakers that lack adequate software capabilities will face significant risks, such as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) delays and budget overruns. They may also lag behind competitors and new entrants, bringing far more innovative products to market much faster. Even more concerning, software issues could result in massive recalls or leave businesses vulnerable to customer safety risks due to hacking attacks.

Research shows a significant gap between strong software organizations and less capable groups, with top businesses reporting throughput and quality three to six times greater than bottom performers. That is a much more significant disparity in productivity than the one between hardware developers. Many automobile companies are becoming more conscious of the benefits of good software development and are taking dramatic measures to increase performance.

 

In the next few years, some companies intend to expand their software capabilities and hire hundreds of software engineers, while others change their governance models, form alliances, and establish global centers of excellence.

These measures, however, are insufficient because actual change will only occur when automakers upgrade their core operating models for software development. According to research, just 40 percent of R&D leaders who see software as a major disruptor are confident in their ability to make the necessary operational changes. While leaders across industry segments have made significant improvements in their software engineering practices, the majority of auto­motive players continue to lag far behind high performers. Agile practices, continuous integration, and automated testing are all areas of concern.

Read Also

The AI Investment Paradox: Why Data Architecture Determines ROI

The AI Investment Paradox: Why Data Architecture Determines ROI

Darren Talham, Chief Technology Officer, Continental Finance Company, LLC
Strategies for Building a More Sustainable Manufacturing Plant

Strategies for Building a More Sustainable Manufacturing Plant

Steven Strobel, Head of Industrial, Manufacturing & Logistics and Aaron Woodward, Principal - Head of Sustainability, Rider Levett Bucknall RLB
Building Specialized Silicon at Industrial Volume

Building Specialized Silicon at Industrial Volume

Danny Kohanek, SVP of Manufacturing, SUMCO
Recycling, Resilience and Regional Strategy: The Three Rs of Automotive Procurement

Recycling, Resilience and Regional Strategy: The Three Rs of Automotive Procurement

Gergely Baranyi, Purchasing Director of Raw Materials and Passive Safety Technologies, Nissan Motor Corporation
To Quantify or not to Quantify, That is the Question

To Quantify or not to Quantify, That is the Question

Ahmeed Ahmeed, Cyber and Information Security Director, Inteva Products
Leveraging the Cloud for Data and Analytics

Leveraging the Cloud for Data and Analytics

Bryan Goodman, Director of Artificial Intelligence Ford Motor Company [NYSE: F]